Agreed. I don't know how one would miss that. -- Flanker 09/04/2021 3:28PMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
Agreed. I don't know how one would miss that. -- Flanker 09/04/2021 3:28PM It is targeting. Unclear why it took so long to trigger the review. -- Fatman 09/04/2021 3:27PM Yep - cost Wisconsin a timeout. ** -- 501 09/04/2021 3:28PM He lead with the helmet…targeting ** -- Tuckahokie 09/04/2021 3:25PM That's targeting, no question ** -- elkridgehokie 09/04/2021 3:28PM Agree with the announcer…does not deserve ejection ** -- Tuckahokie 09/04/2021 3:27PM Player safety has to matter -- Planner_Hokie 09/04/2021 9:51PM Head injuries are serious so I'm all in favor of ejection -- Flanker 09/04/2021 3:32PM If there were some way to prove intent I would agree. But those guys are -- UpstateSCHokie 09/04/2021 3:36PM Just wrap up w arms when tackling -- BAMRising 09/04/2021 3:40PM Agree. As much as I hate PSU, ejection is too harsh. Maybe after the 2nd -- UpstateSCHokie 09/04/2021 3:28PM In that case, the player should be out for 3-5 games ** -- EDGEMAN 09/04/2021 3:39PM Yah - or maybe two targeting penalties in consecutive games = ejection ** -- elkridgehokie 09/04/2021 3:34PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
